Mon 10 Jul 2006
A valuable time spent alone this morning. It has been some time since I have found myself alone in a studio with a camera and the possibility that this opportunity presents. It was refreshing and exciting. I began to dance. I thought I would film myself. I was interested to see just what I might do after more than a year of dancing other people’s moves (in the sense that though it is my body doing the ‘moves’, I did not make them).
I have been thinking about this idea of our multiple histories – of the body (danced and not), emotional history, geographic history, inter personal history and then – our overarching SENSE of history – the word, its place in our minds and how we relate to the fact of its existence. How does this come into play for me when I am moving? How close to a surface does it sit?
The answer (in terms of what I saw) is immediate – I can see flickers of ‘other’ recognisable and clearly earmarked aesthetics protrude quietly or loudly through my bones, from under my skin. So many moments of everyone else. I tried to almost force my way out of information that I do not consider to be exlcusively mine. It is that difficult thing of trying to get past yourself – a tricky task as you are both in your own way and the only one able to help yourself out of habits/patterns/known pathways.But more than this I wanted to have a keen awareness of how my ‘other’ histories might be feeding into my moving.
I wanted to get to (just a small) beginning of feeling like I was dancing and moving out my own information – informed as it is by my past (life, love, births, deaths – the sum of it all [sweeping concept I know]) but uniquely tagged as belonging to my particular history. Is it actually possible? There was small but hearty progress.
An aside: What would happen if, like Kate Winslet’s character in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, I had no sense of not remembering. Would the dance be richer and possibly be able to be described as actually UNIQUE. Or would it lack colour and richness…?
Watching I was reminded of how much information I am trying to sort (in each moment) and yet also how much I do not know or rather – that I see I need pratice at the art of being aware of entertaining (as much) possibility in movement as is possible. I am surpised by how objectively I am able to watch myself move now (a process that has taken some time). I watched and thought about weeding. This is a process that will take some time. I read some interviews with William Forsythe.
“…after my wife died, I had this sensation of her arms around my neck. It was so real that I could really feel it, I was aware that this was a wish but it was a sensation that actually could be experienced and so I thought what if we tried to intensify the body’s memory of itself, wrapped around itself so to speak…” Forsythe talking on ABC.
http://www.abc.net.au/arts/performance/stories/s439792.htm
To conclude – I woke this morning wondering about the purpose of this daily practise in research that is focusing on a cerebral and physical prodding. How is it applicable in the bigger picture? Why does it matter? It is a concern of mine in a socio/cultural environment where the ground keeps shifting under my feet. And then, Forsythe said…” And thenI might say that my work is somehow about the manifold nature of humanity. I would say that people are extraordinarily rich and so I think the work would hopefully tap into that”...And I thought, simply, yes, it is important. And this time in the studio is the stuff that allows time to reflect and investigate and ultimately feed back into the processing history of bodies in movement.
July 11th, 2006 at 11:37 am
Paea – just been reading yet another CQ article (never has one magazine filled time so well). It’s called “Phenomenological Space” and is an interview with somatic educator Hubert Godard (a href=”http://www.resourcesinmovement.com”>Resources In Movement.
In it he talks about SPACE as being “the imaginary building of our relationship to the world”, and which is distinct from TOPOS (“real, geographical, measurable space”).
I want to quote him at length here:
“… space – not the topos – is in fact an imaginary space of action. It doesn’t exist. There is no contact with space out of time and history. The context and my history give the affordance [a term Hubert has borrowed from perceptual psychologist, James Gibson] of what can happen in terms of whole-body gesture and movement. Any why that? Because the space in fact doesn’t exist; it’s a space of action. And this action-space is phenomenological, if you will. The phenomenon of space is sensory based, unique to each person, and time dependent.”
I guess what he discusses reminded me of your post above. In terms of “escaping history” — but the article itself is wonderfully rich for considering context in performance, and the bringing of “self” (in relation to space) to an awareness of expectation, sociological and geographical context, and subjectivity.
But let’s read it and then talk.
ske